Home / Blogs / Big Six: Bad Six

Big Six: Bad Six

The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but in ourselves

Greg Barker, ex-MP for Bexhill & Battle, former Government Minister and the man charged with delivering the Coalition’s Government’s Green Deal programme knows who he is blaming for the programme’s relative failure.

Not DECC. Not the Treasury. Not himself.

No, the blame, according to an interview that Barker gave to The Independent lies firmly with the Big Six energy companies. Eh?

Yes, indeed, Barker, maintains that, had the six large gas and electricity companies put the full force of their, er, energy behind the programme then it would have been a resounding success.

Yeah, right.

In a sense, I can see where he’s coming from. Bear with me on this, fellow cynics. Had the system been set up in a different way, then perhaps it would have worked fine, with the full support of the Big Six.

Imagine this scenario: Energy company A goes to 3, Acacia Avenue, Dullsville, works out how much insulation or upgrading is required to bring it to whatever standard is deemed appropriate. They agree with the householder/bill payer that this work should be carried out because of the energy benefits it would bring. The energy company then does the work – or contracts out to one of the many thousands of installation companies or heating and plumbing engineers – and recoups the cost via a levy on the household energy bill. A levy that the householder probably doesn’t even notice as the insulation improvements have made the house so m much cheaper to run anyway.

Assuming, and it is, I admit, a big assumption, that the bulk of that insulation or heating equipment is purchased via the merchant sector then everyone – everyone, is a winner.

That, my friends, is a scenario in which the Green Deal would have worked and I would not have had to be so snippy and cynical about it.

Alas, someone somewhere, probably in the Treasury, decide that ‘the market’ had to have an influence and decided that householders had to have the final say on who carried out the work, lest they be ripped off by unscrupulous tradesmen. Also, presumably to avoid accusations of closed shops, there had to be an open market in terms of who could provide the finance, lest the Big Six keep all the bounty for themselves (this is probably a not unfounded fear. See CERT etc);

The programme in its final incarnation was overly complicated, relying on installers and installation companies jumping through onerous, time-consuming, expensive hoops to get the correct certification. It was also overly expensive in terms of the loan itself, carrying an APR double that easily available on the High Street.

Then we had the situation where, having realised that they would need to throw money at the programme to encourage take-up, the Government found itself overwhelmed by the speed at which the vouchers were bought up as the money ran out in a matter of days. It’s never actually been proved, but I’m still pretty sure that most of those vouchers were hoovered up by speculative cold-calling companies.

Anyway, all this is probably by-the-by since Elmer Fudd, sorry, Amber Rudd, Barker’s replacement at DECC has hinted that, the age of austerity still being upon us, Government largesse on energy efficiency programmes might be slipping away.

Hey ho. Only another four years and 11 months to go.

About Fiona Russell-Horne

Fiona Russell-Horne
Group Managing Editor across the BMJ portfolio.

Check Also

Celebrate good times, Come on

If an earthquake were to engulf England tomorrow, the English would meet and dine, somewhere …